Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 44 for 2030 Target Scoping Plan Concept Paper (sp-concept-paper-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: John
Last Name: Ribeiro-Broomhead
Email Address: johnsrb3@stanford.edu
Affiliation:
Subject: Comments on 2030 Target Scoping Plan Concept Paper
Comment:
As a native Californian, climate activist, and aspiring climate scientist (pursuing a masters degree in environmental sciences at Stanford), I offer my opinion on international carbon offset programs like REDD, as well as a concise summary of asks from the Asian Pacific Environmental Network. International offsets programs allow for us to feel accomplished and secure in our efforts to reduce GHG emissions, but without strong guarantees that the communities directly impacted by such programs will be protected from disenfranchisement and abuse, I cannot support such programs, as well-intentioned as they may be. I had the great privilege of attending COP21, and it was painfully apparent that given the current state of geopolitics and oversight infrastructure in many participating countries, such guarantees cannot currently be made. California is a leader; if the rest of the world has agreed that mechanisms like REDD are acceptable, we need to go one step further to create more equitable programs that safeguard the rights of people while also reducing our emissions. I support and affirm the Principles of Environmental Justice, the Principles of Climate Justice with a human rights framework that includes the American Declaration on the Rights & Duties of Man, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. While the inclusion of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) is not specifically addressed in the Scoping plan, I urge the CARB to not include international sector-based offsets programs such as REDD into future plans to meet 2030 climate goals. I also urge CARB to cancel the process of including REDD in California’s cap and trade program. I urge your committee to refer to comments submitted by the Environmental Justice Advisory Committee April 4, 2016 which propose that: · California not commit to continuing Cap-and-Trade. Trades cannot be accurately verified and can be subject to fraud. Market based proposals perpetuates disproportionate negative impact exposures to EJ communities. · REDD and other market-based proposals should not be included in the Scoping Plan. Thank you
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2016-07-08 15:14:04
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.