Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 2 for Public Workshop on the Transportation Sector to Inform the 2030 Target Scoping Plan Update (scoplan2030trnspt-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Mike
Last Name: Brady
Email Address: mjbrady@acm.org
Affiliation:
Subject: Climate Change ... land use and transportation
Comment:
So far (have only been watching for about 1/2 hour, admittedly), I'm seeing more of the same. Have you thought of anything new? Some considerations: 1) you focus entirely on central cities, in effect. Are you planning on declaring the single family home illegal? What about suburbs that are a sunk cost, and still very attractive for people. Note that most "affordable" housing in the current market isn't downtown - it's in the inner or middle-ring suburbs. 2) transit: what about the Uber phenomenon and self-driving cars? Frankly, Uber if used creatively could put the more marginal local transit lines out of business even now; with robo-cabs (to use an old sci-fi term which seems to be coming true) there would simply be no need for local transit any more. Yes, that could also put suburbs back on the map. Are you going to try to force Uber out of business? 3) building downtown: it's expensive to build downtown. Land cost is high, infrastructure and utilities are expensive to improve (and needs improvement in many places!), health and safety are actually not particularly good. So you don't find families there - it's a high-priced singles and such environment. You're not going to change that. Improving older areas near downtown sounds good, and is, but usually results in "gentrification" that drives out lower-income people - how do you propose to deal with that? Will probably think of a few more things. But note: much of what you're talking about already happens where it makes economic sense. When was the last time you saw major new road capacity built? It's too expensive. But with continuing low fuel prices and increasing fuel economy there's more traffic (a well-performing economy is part of that) which will eventually force SOME new capacity. If it's impossible to achieve GHG reductions without forcing people into tiny apartments and outlawing powered transportation, how is it that we're achieving the original AB32 goals without massive changes to the system? Oh yes: increase the gas tax, stupid politicians. And your vision of the future is pretty dark unless you're a young urban professional with a good income.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2016-09-14 10:11:53
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.