First Name | Don |
---|---|
Last Name | Reeve |
Email Address | dreeve@reevetrucking.com |
Affiliation | Reeve Trucking Company |
Subject | Private Fleet Rule |
Comment | I started my business in 1976. I have been one to for the last 32 years, to do my best to support and adopt all regulations be them state or federal that intend to better our industry in regards to safety or the well being of the motoring public. What CARB is attempting with the private fleet rule, I feel is well intended and deserves my support and the efforts of all companies in the trucking industry. I own 101 trucks. I operate in 11 western states, but 85% of what I do is inside the state of California. I primarily service some extremely specialized areas of the transportation industry. I have been able to purchase 5 2008 power units so far in an effort to get the ball rolling in the right direction in regard to my personal situation. I am and have been aggressively as possible updating equipment and planning in every way I can to move my fleet in the direction CARB has outlined in the private fleet rule. The issues that exist for me and the problems that I face at the pace set forth by CARB are as follows: 1) The economy in its current state has slowed down my business to the point where I am desperately struggling to continue to fund my employees 401(k) and to maintain their benefits at there current levels going forward. This leaves very little capital to allot to more new equipment at this time or in the foreseeable future. 2) I have tried to obtain grants of various types and have learned that is has been pretty much a waste of time due to the fact that my company doesn't qualify for one reason or another. This being said it is extremely difficult to pass on the additional cost of the newer trucks in any large volume to my customers in the form of rate increases especially in this economy. I have also found it next to impossible to obtain a reasonable interest rate on the equipment I have coming in due to the financial situation that exists in our nation today. 3) One of my biggest obstacles that is unique to my company is the unique spec and unusual configuration of the majority of my power units. To do the kind of work I do properly my normal spec truck is a cabover engine body style with an extremely long wheel base and high horse power engines. This makes my trucks irreplaceable with what's available today in regard to the cab design that I need for the many 80' to 140' loads that I haul on a regular basis. If I were to do away with all of my cabovers and replace them with the trucks that are available through the manufacturers today at the pace CARB has set forth in their plan I would surely be unable to service the majority of my customers. 4) A huge concern to me is my largest customer; a precast concrete products manufacturer has installed on 30 of my trucks a hydraulic crane for the purpose of off-loading their product at the jobsite. In order to maintain the load space on the truck in addition to having the crane mounted as it is currently would not only be impossible now that the cabover engine truck in unavailable by any supplier, but in addition it would be astronomically expensive to remove these permanently installed cranes and re-install them on new chassis. 5) Another large impact to my operation is going to be the fact that no other state particularly cares what CARB is up to in California and if I'm put into a position to conform and then try to compete with all my competitors out of state that are not burdened with the costs that I am subjected to, I would surely lose that portion of my market share. 6) I've seen no plan on how CARB is planning to tie this program to any effective enforcement policy, leaving me to wonder will it be like so many other regulations that exist in our industry where legitimate companies are burdened with the costs of doing it right while competing with others that don't even come close. I do not see any way possible that my operation, that I have worked very hard since I was 18 years old to build could possibly survive the transition that I would have to go through to conform to the private fleet rule as it is currently proposed. With all due respect I sincerely ask that CARB and all concerned please take into consideration the many obstacles that they are placing before me and the many companies like mine as they finalize the private fleet rule. I strongly urge that the California Trucking Association alternative is considered as we all try to achieve the goals and good intentions for all of us that live in the State of California, that CARB is trying to accomplish. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-12-10 11:51:59 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.