First Name | Robert |
---|---|
Last Name | Dorazio |
Email Address | marym911@aol.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | On Road Truck Rule (proposed) |
Comment | The proposed method merits consideration of alternative plans, primarily due to the present plan's economic improbability for any measure of success. The recent past with electric de-regulation made this state the object of many lessons; please do not create another debacle with the trucking. One principle feature of the proposed rule is the 'Best' available control technology. With the present rule, the retrofit DPF device is essentially the only acceptable solution. However, the word "best" is an oxymoron. The technological "best" is a 2010 engine with matched SCR filter. A mandate toward a retrofit filter may not provide the overall solution being sought as it will relegate limited economic resources toward a retrofit technology which may include an upgraded engine. These engines which were not designed for the retrofit filter from a backpressure standpoint or an oil consumption standpoint. The use of Level I and II devices should be allowed as part of this emission reduction plan. My one truck is operated less than 2000 (two thousand) miles annually (and passes the smoke test). With the proposed rule, at the end of 2012 it will need a filter. There is no filter available for the engine so we must change the engine and add a filter - big bucks necessary with (1) no financing options and (2) not being able to 'pass the cost on' for the mileage utilized. As a suggestion, why not provide an option for a level 1 or 2 device with a five or ten thousand mileage limit? If this was allowed for far less cost, then the funds would hopefully diverted to a used 2010 truck in say around 2015 or 2016 where the economy must certainly be better. I recently noticed a specific business sector has recently arranged for a mileage cap and deadline extension in order to absolutely exempt some vehicles - any reason level 1 or 2 devices were not invoked to at least obtain some of the credit needed to meet the EPA mandated targets? Please consider suggestions being offered and provide a clean air solution that we can all live with - yes, literally so for many folks. Sincerely, Robert Dorazio PO Box 604, Avila Beach,CA 93424 (San Luis Obispo County) |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-11-25 13:18:49 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.