First Name | Andy |
---|---|
Last Name | Cox |
Email Address | acox@mcalog.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Fleet Calculators and Emissions numbers |
Comment | I work for a company that will need to meet the requirements of the ARB's new Truck and Bus Rule. I have examined the language and numbers of the proposed regulation and have found some numbers that seem to be incorrect. The numbers in the fleet calculator further prove my point. The numbers are such that no HHD truck older than Engine Model Year 2007 will ever meet the required PM emissions target of .110 g/mile, even with a DPF that cuts emissions by 85%. As shown in the attached file "Fleet Calc Error PM 2.xls," all of the trucks with Engine MY1994-2006 will only reach .122 g/mile of PM. The Fleet Calculator shows that a fleet of MY1994-2006 engines will meet BACT 100%, but the numbers do not show that. On the opposite end of the spectrum, I can insert an incredibly old Engine Model Year (MY1923 in "Fleet Calc Error PM 1.xls") into the calculator and still return 100% BACT compliance even though the Fleet Average PM level would be .504 g/mile. As for the NOx emissions, the greatest reduction as required by the Truck and Bus Rule will only get a MY2006 Engine (85% NOx reduction) down to 1.80 g/mile of NOx (see "Fleet Calc Error NOx 1.xls") . The NOx target is below that number at 1.60 g/mile NOx. In fact, in the "Fleet Calc Error NOx 2.xls" file even a MY2011 Engine will not meet MY2010 emissions requirements, as the numbers show that it still emits 2.50 g/mile NOx. The numbers must be addressed before this rule is approved. As it currently stands, the ARB's numbers for calculating Emissions Targets and Averages are conflicting in the both the language of the rule and the fleet calculators. I believe that one way to repair this conflict is to change the numbers in the Appendix A section of the rule (page A-45). (For instance, in Table A-1 of Appendix A, MY1994-2006 HHD should change the PM emissions factor from 0.81 to 0.73). If the numbers stay the same, then the ARB will have to require further PM and NOx reduction from filters that are already required to eliminate 85% of PM emissions and 20-85% of NOx emissions. Please consider these conflicts when you meet to finalize your regulation. These types of errors could create immense problems with the implementation of the ARB regulation and require a complete overhaul of the rule. Thank you. |
Attachment | www.arb.ca.gov/lists/truckbus08/63-fleet_calc_errors.zip |
Original File Name | Fleet Calc Errors.zip |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-11-24 16:40:08 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.