Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 19 for Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation 2008 (truckbus08) - 45 Day.

First NameScott
Last NameCramer
Email Addressscramer@cfl-usa.com
Affiliation
SubjectTruck & Bus Rule
Comment
Dear Members of the California Air Recourses Board,

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is currently considering
the adoption of an on-road diesel truck and bus regulation that, if
implemented as presently drafted, would have a profound and
negative impact on California’s overall economy. 

I want to be clear: Certified Freight Logistics is very supportive
of reducing particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
emissions from diesel engines. There is no disagreement that we
need to work collectively to improve the state’s air quality and
all of us want to provide as healthy an environment as possible for
our families, our employees and all Californians. However, in its
current form, the Board’s proposed regulation places a significant
economic risk on our business, today, and jeopardizes our future
viability in the trucking industry. 

I am writing to urge the state to adopt a regulation that allows
for flexibility and early incentives, while also achieving
significant emission reductions. To that end, the Driving Toward A
Cleaner California Coalition, has submitted an alternative proposal
to the current ARB proposed regulation. This alternative proposal
would achieve the early PM and NOx emissions reductions to improve
the state’s air quality that you are seeking in the ARB’s current
proposed rule, while providing much-needed flexibility to comply
based on a variety of factors including mileage, type and use of
the vehicle, and the best use of the available technology. 

This rule comes at a time when California truck owners are
struggling to make ends meet in the most severe economic climate
we’ve experienced in decades -- skyrocketing diesel prices, record
home foreclosures, a 17-year low in housing starts, a credit crisis
and the imminent threat of a full-blown recession.

Under the annual emission reduction targets required under the
current ARB proposal, many truck owners will be required to first
retrofit an engine, only to have to turn around a few years later
and replace those trucks. 

Many of California’s trucking companies have already begun the
process of retrofitting or replacing its fleet, whether in the
normal course of their business cycle or in anticipation of these
regulations.  However, the smaller owner/operators – those with
fleets of five trucks or less – who make up more than 55 percent of
all trucks registered in the state, will be severely hampered by
the costs of retrofitting or replacing trucks that, in some cases,
are the sole assets of their family-owned businesses. Additionally,
many of these companies simply do not have the resources or access
to capital to retrofit their engines and may be forced to sell off
their trucks or shutter the company’s doors, ultimately costing
jobs and revenue to the state’s economy. 

We must not forfeit California’s economy for the sake of
protecting our environment. That’s why, as a member of the Driving
Toward a Cleaner California Coalition, we’re working together,
across industry sectors to develop a feasible solution that
achieves the state’s air quality goals while keeping California’s
economy moving forward. I ask that you evaluate the coalition’s
alternative proposal and work with the industries impacted by this
rule to adopt a final product that achieves the balance this
alternative proposal seeks to find.

We look forward to working with you, CARB, environmental
organizations, the Legislature and other stakeholders to accomplish
these goals.

Sincerely, 

Scott Cramer

Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2008-11-10 09:15:42

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home