Comment Log Display

Well, as usual, this agency relies on computer models to determine
risks and affects. They explicitly state that they neither measured
actual PM or collected actual information on health affects on real
people. This raises the question: How can a computer model be
devised and calibrated without input from actual statistics based
on reality? This type of "virtual" extrapolation is neither science
or a valid means of determining policies that promise to cripple
the economy. It's amazing that this passes as intelligence. What
does this endless stream of "science fair" projects cost us all,
not only to produce, but the aftermath of regulations that follow?
Is there any form of peer review of these studies? 
(Reprinted from a blog)