Comment Log Display

I am writing to express strong concern about the proposed
recommendation within the AB 32 Scoping plan to target a reduction
of 5 million metric tons (MMT) annually of greenhouse gases from
Regional Transportation-Related Targets. Specifically, we
understand that the Board is being asked by some to increase that
target to something higher, potentially significantly higher, than
5 million metric tons.

We strongly urge the Board NOT to increase the Regional
Transportation-Related Targets any further. While we question
whether sufficient scientific information exists to support
quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions from passenger vehicles
at the proposed 5 MMT level, we know of no credible scientific
evidence that would indicate that larger reductions are reasonably
achievable or sustainable without causing dislocations and extreme
economic hardships.  

Senate Bill 375 sets out the process to determine the actual
regional transportation-related GHG targets. That process needs to
be given deference and allowed to work. It should not be preempted
at this early stage by unilateral action by the Board.

Homebuilders and their consultants have a vested interest in the
success of SB 375 and AB 32. They also have a vested interest in
assisting the state out of its current and profound economic
malaise. Imposing out-of-proportion burdens on California’s
homebuilders and consumers will neither help our struggling economy
nor realistically achieve our AB 32 goals. 

I strongly urge you not to increase the Regional
Transportation-Related Targets any further.