First Name | Sandra |
---|---|
Last Name | Trutt |
Email Address | s.trutt@verizon.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Cap and Trade |
Comment | Dear CARB, What a wonderful job you have done on this Scoping Plan. It's well thought out and it gives me hope that it will have a great impact on the environment. Thank you for all your hard work. The only troubling part of this plan is the Cap & Trade provision. It seems to me that this will increase the toxic load on the areas that already are heavily impacted by pollution because companies can trade their emissions from someone who is planting trees, has a greener business or is located in a cleaner environment. Under the Executive Summary it is stated that "Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, etc..." would be an effective part of the plan. That is an excellent idea. This leads directly to the question, Why not create a carbon fee? If raised rates on water will reduce use, so will a fee on carbon emitted by companies. I know it is probably less popular, but it would surely work. And there are no negative impacts on any one region. All impacts would be positive. Yes, a Carbon fee would hurt manufacturers and businesses, but they would change their behavior quickly in order to avoid paying the fee. Please consider this information and do what is best for all parts of California. Thank you for your consideration. Sandra Trutt, Los Angeles |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-11-16 20:15:08 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.