Comment Log Display

Hello,
I wish to voice my concern that the scope of the CARB dialog is
being moved along by the 'balance sheets' of Multi-National
Corporations; other-than the health of the Earth and it's Living
Things. If this CARB model is to be a benefit to the biosphere and
natural environment it must at least be a mirror of the Euro
Program. 

Having worked in the construction trade for a good length of my
life, I understand this premiss: 'if you have a question about the
construction-you over build it'.  Why would we under build
something only to see it fail?  In construction as in Program
building this 'under building' will cause failure.  A Program will
fail or a home will fall as these are the end products of 'under
building'.  The value of 'over building' is no one will ever say
"now why the heck did you do it that way?".  The value is in it. 

Already the foundation of a system exists on the Chicago Exchange
and has for some time now. The CARB plan must be BETTER than that,
I'm thinking.  'Cus this is the Golden State, we lead and very
seldom follow.

Tightening Carbon Offsets in your CARB program will not undervalue
your Program by 'under building', which seeks failure.  But thru
'over building' we reap substained value. 

Then at the end of the day--we can be rest assured; as the
Founding Settlers of our State claimed--just as they crossed the
High Sierras and saw the Golden Land: "we have done our best."

Thank you for your time in this matter,

Dennis McHale
Citizen
Canyon Land Conservation Fund