First Name | Michael |
---|---|
Last Name | Pelizzari |
Email Address | nextgalaxy@aol.com |
Affiliation | People Acting in Community Together |
Subject | Carbon Tax Needed |
Comment | When will CARB recognize that global warming is an emergency, and stop relying entirely on voluntary measures to deal with it? For some inexplicable reason, the words "carbon tax" are not even mentioned in your Proposed AB32 Scoping Plan. Your euphemism for it, "carbon fee", is only mentioned in passing but then promptly ignored, as if "tax" is unthinkable. No wonder the state is going bankrupt! A carbon tax would be a much simpler, more direct, and more effective device for cutting carbon emissions than virtually anything else offered in the Scoping Plan. A gradually increasing carbon tax, starting at 5 cents per gallon ($20 per ton of emitted carbon) and increasing 5 cents per year between now and 2100, would motivate practically everybody in the state to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, without all the expensive micromanaging of the "Carbon Economy" envisioned by most of the contributors to the Scoping Plan. There is nothing like a punitive tax or fee to deter unwanted behavior. Phasing it in slowly but surely will minimize the pain to consumers, avoid a disruptive stampede away from fossil fuels, and eventually wean even the rich from fossil fuels. This form of carbon tax could also alleviate the state's budget problems by generating a reliable revenue stream. It would grow during the early years at a predictable pace, and shrink in the later years as fossil fuel consumption is driven down by the ever more burdensome tax rate. By then the burgeoning Green Economy would provide a tax base that compensates for the falling carbon tax revenues. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-12-10 01:03:12 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.