First Name | John |
---|---|
Last Name | Reed MD |
Email Address | drgoodwrench@cox.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Why is Natural Gas Conversion excluded? |
Comment | The current Verification of Diesel Emissions Reduction Strategies regulation specifically excludes Natural Gas as alternative fuel in direct conflict with the CEC and the Governor's Energy Advisory Panel's objective to increase Natural gas use as an alternative fuel. Under the current regulations, the only options available to fleet owners are to install expensive exhaust treatments that only increase operating and fuel costs, the carbon footprint of each of these vehicles, and may actually increase the NOx output. There is NO BENEFIT TO THE END USER, and therefore no economic incentive to be in compliance. Allowing these fleet owners to convert existing in-use engines to run on Natural gas gives them an opportunity to meet current and future standards quickly and inexpensively while actually decreasing their operating costs through fuel and maintenance savings. This provides an economic incentive that actually benefits the business owner and thus the economy. NOx and PM reductions are so much more dramatic with Natural gas that both the South Coast and San Joaquin areas should be able to attain federal air quality standards ahead of schedule, as fleet owners now have an incentive to be in compliance.All this and a decrease in Carbon footprint of 20-80%, thereby taking the lead in reducing Carbon output. The verification of technologies scheme does not need to be changed to allow use of Natural Gas conversion technology. All that needs to be done is to give up on the distinction between spark and compression ignited engines. There should be no distinction. Simply continue to define engines by their intended Horsepower output as you do currently, and allow providers of this technology to have their products verified in the same manner as the EGR and SCR providers. Under current regs, Natural Gas converted engines must go through a complete certification process as a unique NEWLY Manufactured engine. This means each individual engine is required to go through this process at a cost of $100,000 or more. A requirement which precludes anyone from ever doing a conversion. At the Port of Long Beach UTR project (the one listed on the front page of the ARB website), two Natural Gas converted 5.9 liter Cummins engines are being tested and have performed excellently, exceeding all expectations. But SSA can't actually move forward with converting the fleet as it would cost nearly $2Billion dollars to certify all 2000 UTRs that have this type of engine. If the ARB would simply level the playing field, and allow this conversion technology to be certified in the same manner as the SCR and EGR technologies, the ARB could see the entire Long Beach port realize a PM reduction of 99.9%, and HC, Carbon and NOx reductions of 80% on average. This would be accomplished in a three year time frame. Change the regulation please. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2007-05-23 22:21:52 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.