First Name | Richard |
---|---|
Last Name | Davis |
Email Address | mt.pockets2@roadrunner.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Proposed Regulation For In-Use On-Road Diesel Vehicles |
Comment | I would like to express my views regarding the proposed rules being considered for On-Road diesel engines. As an owner operator and small business owner this is a recipe for disaster for the little guy like me. A bill such as this would bankrupt me in a heart beat. If there was any chance the board could slide out from behind their golden desks and come on down and talk to the common Joe the truck driver (owner operator), small construction company owner, and the little guy who is the back bone to the economy of this state I’m sure you would be blown away to find how down to earth we are and just how much we do care for our environment. I am probable your worst nightmare for I am a truck driver and a gun owner and off-road vehicle owner and love to hunt and fish .But you forget as much as people hate hunters remember with our enforcement to limits and the money for the licensees the animals thrive due to the improvement to their habitats. With that said the majority of the drivers (owner operators) small construction companies have no problem with cleaner air. The problem lies with the time limits .As a small business owner I am my only employee and the profits are little if any. Infact this last tax filing I was actually $2000.00 in the red. Now these new laws will put me right out of business. Why not go to the engine manufactures and faze them in over time and if needed older trucks help with the retrofitting of newer engines. I will tell you in my truck I run a Caterpillar engine and to replace it with at least a 1995 engine my cost at this time is a minimal of $30,000.00. This is no way feasible now especially with the housing market slowing I may be going out of state for work if things don’t pick up. I may spend too much on my maintenance but my truck runs strong and is mechanically sound and a safe piece of equipment. I am proud of my truck. I ask you to really consider the following: The time line to change over a fleet (1 to 20 trucks) is too harsh with the completion time to short. Which will mean a LOT of money will be needed to up date or buy new equipment over a short period of time. Money I simply do not have. Please extend the time line. The manufactures, like the auto industry, should be forced to do these changes in coming models as well as retrofitting existing equipment. More programs should be available to help the industry make the change. This is a big industry with a lot of small businesses (family businesses) that just make a living and don’t have a lot of money to make the change over. Why burden small businesses with this? Why not the manufacturer? They make the profit and serve a much larger market than just CALIFORNIA. Why make my truck, my only asset valueless overnight with timelines that will eliminate my truck. I need to be allowed to use my truck until I am able to update it or the STATE helps to update it. After all it is not the truck that pollutes, it is the engine; the most costly piece of the truck. Thank you for your time. Richard D. Davis Owner operator JDSR Company |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2007-05-17 21:25:52 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.