First Name | Rod |
---|---|
Last Name | Winkle |
Email Address | rod@franklinconstruction.com |
Affiliation | Franklin Construction, Inc. |
Subject | Impact of the In use off road diesel regulation on our company |
Comment | My name is Rod Winkle and I am the President of Franklin Construction, Inc. in Chico California. We are a general engineering contractor and own a large number of off road diesel machines. I have been going to the workshops for this regulation for the last year and have become familiar with the regulation itself including the most current modifications. As a company, we have been responsible over the last ten years as far as equipment goes and have made every effort to replace our existing equipment with new, cleaner machines to the degree that we have been able to afford it. We are a state certified small business doing between $10 and $11 million of business per year and have a maximum of 30 employees at the peak of the season. As far as this regulation is concerned, we are now considered a "Large fleet" at roughly 9500 total horsepower. Ironic-a small business with a large fleet. I dont even need to run my fleet through the calculator to know that we are not compliant and will need to follow the 10%/20% replace/retrofit/retire process to comply with this regulation. That means we will have to replace around 950 horsepower of engines or equipment per year for NOX and 1900 horsepower of modifications for PM. In just the NOX portion, 950 horsepower is a very large number. In a normal year we can not afford to replace or add 950 horsepower to our fleet unless we are buying old used equipment. In rough numbers, If I were to buy near new used equipment to upgrade 950 horsepower from existing equipment to used tier 2(or tier 3 if available)equipment I would have to buy a Cat 631g Scraper, a Cat 14H motor grader, and a Cat 615C(which is a flex tier 2)scraper to get to around 950 horsepower. The cost, based on todays current used equipment market would be around $1.2 million dollars. I could sell the 3 older machines for around $350,000 if I am lucky with a net expenditure of $850,000. If we were to do around $11 million dollars worth of work in the same year that we replace this equipment, our normal profit would be in the range of $660,000 to a high of $850,000 in a good year. Can you see the dilema? We would have to do something like this every year until we comply or for ever since the regulation is a sliding scale type of arangement that moves from tier 2 to tier 3 to tier 4. It will take more money than we can ever make to comply with this regulation. We will be faced with downsizing our fleet by 50% or more to get down to the newest, cleanest machines that we have and then building back up to the fleet that we currently have now if we ever can. This regulation will drop our net worth, cost employees that are well paid and well taken care(we provide family plan inurance paid by the company, profit sharing, 401K matching at $0.50 per the dollar, bonuses, and interest free loans to employees when in need). We will be forced to drop many of these benefits just to keep working and buying equipement or paying for costly, time consuming engine retrofits. I cant see where any of this is going to work out very well for our company, employees, our local economy, our county, or our state. It is just to rapid of a pace. I strongly believe in upgrading our fleet to be cleaner. I have childern that I want to survive and breath clean air. I also want to have income from the business that I have been in for generations while saving money for my children to go to college. This regulation is just going to destroy all but the largest general engineering contractors that own construction equipment and depend on it for thier living. I think that the regulation needs to exist, but the pace of compliance with the regulation needs to be slowed down in order for owners and manufacturers of equipment to keep pace and actually accomplish the end result. This regulation will do no one any good in the present form. What good will it do if the regulation puts most companies out of business or downsizes them? Add to this regulation the already existing PERP program as well as the soon to come On road in use diesel regulation. We own all categories of equipment. When all 3 of these regulations are passed and running concurrently, we will be in real trouble. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2007-05-07 11:14:16 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.