First Name | dan |
---|---|
Last Name | huntington |
Email Address | daniel.huntington@att.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | SOON Program Regulations |
Comment | I support the changes to remove the dollar threshold from the definition of a small business; the removal of the VDECS requirement for SOON funded projects and the proposal to make the SOON program voluntary for 2008. Despite this, there are numerous implementation problems with the SOON program as it is written and it needs to be changed because applying the Carl Moyer incentive funding requirements to a mandatory program make it completely unworkable. Specifically: SOON is not voluntary. Making the program voluntary for 2008 was the proper step to resolve the many issues that have arisen with the SOON program. We would recommend that it be made voluntary until 2012. SOON is too restrictive. Unfortunately, the requirements proposed by the air districts that re-powers must be done from Tier 0 to Tier 3 engines, significantly reduces the pool of eligible equipment. We would recommend that the SOON program be replaced with a replacement or scrappage program aimed at just the five specific pieces of equipment that can meet the re-power requirements. SOON applies to equipment that cannot qualify for the Moyer program. Many contractors will be in the SOON program by reason of their 20,000 horsepower fleet and 40% Tier 0 and Tier 1 machines, but that does not mean that they will own equipment that can be re-powered under the Moyer requirements. SOON should not be open to all air districts. SOON was intended to assist the two air districts in California that need to meet the 2014 deadline to achieve compliance with the Federal PM2.5 standard. Both of those districts are approaching the program differently and it will result in confusing and conflicting requirements for contractors who operate in multiple districts. Adding other districts to the regulation will only compound the confusion. SOON is too costly for contractors. Most contractors will struggle to meet the CARB base rule compliance and will probably have to reduce the size of their fleets in order to meet the fleet averages because they will not be able to afford the turnover and retrofit requirements. This will reduce the capacity of those firms and the size of the jobs they will be able to bid in the future. The economic circumstances for the industry have only grown worse since 2007 and are not expected to improve before the middle of 2009 or later. SOON puts an unfair economic hardship on contractors. Due to the Moyer contract requirements proposed for the SOON program, contractors can expect to lose equity in the SOON funded equipment which will reduce their ability to borrow and bond for their company needs to work outside the air district as opportunities arise in other parts of the state. The construction industry is subject to multiple rules for which cumulative impact analysis has not been conducted. Most contractors is California own portable, off-road and on-road equipment in order to properly service their construction contracts. CARB needs to devise a way to provide flexibility in meeting emission reductions from the entire company fleet, not just dictate a series of fleet averages based on equipment type. Remember, if you are the owner of a large fleet of more than 20,000hp, you will have to meet even higher requirements under this rule - make sure CARB hears directly from you. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-03-03 18:52:15 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.