Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 76 for Low Carbon Fuel Standard (lcfs09) - 45 Day.

First NameKate
Last NameMcMahon
Email AddressKMcMahon@foe.org
AffiliationFriends of the Earth
SubjectEnvironmental CEO Letter of Support for ILUC in LCFS
Comment
Center for International Environmental Law 
Clean Water Action 
Defenders of Wildlife
Environment America
Environmental Defense Fund
Friends of the Earth
Natural Resources Defense Council
National Parks Conservation Association
National Wildlife Federation  
Union of Concerned Scientists


Mary Nichols
Chairman, California Air Resources Board
1001 I Street
P.O. Box 2815
Sacramento, CA  95812

April 14, 2009

Dear Chairman Nichols,

On behalf of our millions of members and activists, we voice our
support for the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and urge the Air
Resources Board to account for indirect emissions from land use
changes in the standard.

The California LCFS sets a critical precedent as the world’s first
regulation to require reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from
transportation fuels. To achieve these reductions, the LCFS must
account for the full lifecycle inventory of greenhouse gas
emissions caused by biofuel production, including both direct
emissions and indirect emissions from land use change. Ignoring the
emissions from indirect land use change will undermine the
environmental benefits of the LCFS and set a poor precedent for any
future policies attempting to reduce global warming pollution from
transportation and other sectors. Furthermore, excluding these
emissions from the regulation would directly contradict the best
available science. 
 
CARB has already performed significant work to analyze and model
these types of emissions. The analysis of indirect emissions is
complex, indeed, but numerous academic studies have developed
calculations for these types of emissions. Over the past two years,
ARB together with teams of scientists and economists from the
University of California and Purdue University have drawn from the
best available information and peer-reviewed models to account for
these emissions. Their results show that these emissions are
significant and cannot be ignored. Moving ahead with a rule but
delaying or omitting the inclusion of indirect land use effects in
the model would imply that farmland is limitless, and would ignore
the major impact of agriculture and deforestation on the climate.
This is clearly not supported by the science and is inconsistent
with the goal of providing real reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions. 

We look forward to the Board’s approval of this rule incorporating
indirect land use change and thank you in advance for addressing
our concerns.


Sincerely, 

Daniel Magraw 
President
Center for International Environmental Law

John DeCock 
President
Clean Water Action

Rodger Schlickeisen
President
Defenders of Wildlife

Margie Alt
Executive Director
Environment America

Fred Krupp
President
Environmental Defense Fund

Brent Blackwelder
President
Friends of the Earth 

Frances Beinecke
President
Natural Resources Defense Council

Tom Kiernan
President 
National Parks Conservation Association

Larry Schweiger 
President and CEO
National Wildlife Federation

Kevin Knobloch
President
Union of Concerned Scientists 


CC: 	Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger 
	Secretary Linda Adams, Cal/EPA
	Board Members, California Air Resources Board
	Mr. James Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources
Board

Attachment www.arb.ca.gov/lists/lcfs09/90-iluc_letter_to_carb__ceo__final.pdf
Original File NameILUC Letter to CARB _CEO_ FINAL.pdf
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2009-04-14 09:45:38

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home