First Name | Chris |
---|---|
Last Name | Carney |
Email Address | ccarney@ucsusa.org |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Union of Concerned Scientists comments on the LCFS |
Comment | March 25, 2009 Mary Nichols, Chairman California Air Resources Board 1001 I St., P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Re: California Low Carbon Fuel Standard Dear Chairman Nichols and Members of the Board: The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) applauds the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for developing the framework for a performance-based standard to reduce global warming pollution from our transportation fuels. By holding fuel providers accountable for emissions from the entire life cycle of making and using a fuel, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard will not only protect California from dangerously high-carbon fuels, like liquid coal and petroleum from tar sands, but also has the potential to provide incentives for a new generation of cleaner transportation fuels. UCS also strongly supports CARB’s inclusion of indirect land use changes from biofuel production. The science is clear on the basics: increased demand for crops to make fuel results in higher global commodity prices that can induce farmers in other countries to plow up sensitive ecosystems - including rain forests in South America and Southeast Asia that have a high degree of biodiversity. For some carbon-rich land types such as forests, a great deal of global warming pollution can be released from the soil and trees when this land is cleared and plowed. The scientific debate will continue on which methods and models can best calculate the emissions from such indirect land uses changes, but CARB’s proposed values are, if anything, conservative. Any fuels policy that ignores the indirect consequences of biofuels production can lead to perverse outcomes that appear to decrease emissions in the U.S. fuel sector, but actually increase global warming pollution worldwide. UCS sees several opportunities to strengthen the LCFS, including: * using a science-based accounting for greenhouse gas emissions over time to account for the global warming potential of heat-trapping gases accumulating in the atmosphere; * ensuring the LCFS provides real pollution reductions and ushers in a new generation of ultra low-carbon fuels; including minimum safeguards to ensure the LCFS does not provide unintended incentives for fuel production that result in ecological harm to our federal lands, forests, and other sensitive ecosystems; *including metrics to ensure the LCFS provides incentives for the development of broadly sustainable alternative fuels, while avoiding unintended support for fuels with negative environmental or social impacts, such as raising food prices; and * setting protections for California's air quality and public health. While there is room for the LCFS to be strengthened, UCS commends CARB for setting the framework for a cutting-edge fuel policy founded on a basic principle: the LCFS sets a performance standard and allows fuels compete in the marketplace to meet the standard, without picking winners or losers. There is still time to avoid the worst consequences of global warming, but it is critical that California gets the full emission reductions possible from our transportation fuels. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the staff proposal for the LCFS. UCS will submit more detailed and complete comments before the end of the public comment period. Sincerely, Patricia Monahan Deputy Director for Clean Vehicles Chris Carney Western Region Outreach Coordinator The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices. Founded in 1969, UCS is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and also has offices in Berkeley, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. For more information, go to www.ucsusa.org. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2009-03-25 08:09:28 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.