First Name | Craig |
---|---|
Last Name | Phillips |
Email Address | cphillips@ironmanparts.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Input on the Drayage Truck Rule |
Comment | Ironman would like to provide input on specific aspects of the Draft Regulation to Control Emissions from In-Use On-Road Diesel-Fueled Heavy-Duty Drayage Trucks. Ironman is currently one of the significant providers of Retrofit devices and installations in California. Ironman hopes that our comments and suggestions, based on insight and experience, might be beneficial in enhancing the ARB regulation. The 2 years provided to complete Phase 1 of the Drayage truck rule would not be a concern if the retrofits were completed in a balanced manner over the 24 month period. In Ironman’s experience with the Solid Waste Collection Vehicle Rule and the Fleet Rule for Public Agencies & Utilities, most fleets focus on the “just-in-time” strategy. 80% of the individuals affected by the ARB emissions rule delay compliance as long as possible, in this case compliance would be delayed to the last quarter of 2009. This “just-in-time” strategy creates a peak in DPF manufacturing & installation labor demand and therefore puts a severe strain on resources to complete the requirements of retrofitting by the deadline. Ironman believes that drafting a regulation that encourages a balanced retrofit program through different incentives would be most helpful. This balanced program can be achieved by implementing a schedule of deadlines and progressively requiring certain percentages of the fleets to achieve compliance. This approach would allow all funding resources, retrofit manufacturers, installers and compliance regulators to be more cohesive in supporting the Drayage fleets to achieve the goal of 100% compliance in a balanced and timely fashion. A second method for a balanced program would be to develop a tiered incentive and provide early adopters in 2008 with a higher dollar incentive towards the retrofit. The fleets that delay compliance until the final half of 2009 would receive a lower incentive. This would provide fleets with the financial incentive to get the work done as early as possible, emission reductions would be realized sooner, and everyone would benefit from a more balanced approach in meeting the deadline. Ironman trust that you find this input constructive in formulating and finalizing the new Drayage Truck regulation. We look forward to working with ARB and the Drayage Truck owners to assist in providing “Emission Compliance with Confidence™”. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2007-11-07 16:46:49 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.