Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 3 for Draft Environmental Analysis for Scoping Plan Update (drafteaspu14) - Non-Reg.

First NameHarvey
Last NameEder
Email Addressharveyederpspc@yahoo.com
AffiliationPt 2 Ex Dir Public Solar Power Coalition
SubjectTotal CA Solar Conversion by 2023 or in 9 Years HE PSPC SC 119641 Eder v SCAQMD et. al.
Comment
This is Part 2 of Comments. Part 1 was written on April 25, 2014
and submitted both for Comment 29 For Draft Proposed First Update
To The Climate Change Scoping Plan  and to The Draft Environmental
Analysis Prepared For Proposed First Update To The Climate Change
Scoping Plan ...Today is Monday April 28,2014

T^he Environmental Analysis is Illegal and not a sick bird rather a
bird...

Solar Energy makes the wind blow the water flow and the plants grow
. It is the engine of our ecosystem. It's the way things work.

Solar systems have becomje life cycle cost effective as the costs
of systems and interest rates have declined in recent years. 
 
CARB approved  on Dec 25,2012 the SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality
Management Districts December 2012 Air Quality Management Plan .
This is illegal and fattening.  Both  SCD and CARB asw2ell as San
Juaquine District and the Bay Area District as well as the rest of
the State must by cinvwerted to ImmediTE tOTAL sOLAR eNERGY BY 2020
 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. wE (THE REGAL WE) HAVE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH epa
 AND WILL OPPOSE THE 2012 sip ANDSdISTRICTS pLANS tHAT ARE nOT
iMMEDIATE tOTAL sOLAR cONVERSION pLANS & iMMPLEMENTATIONS. 

In the State of CA Supreme Court Caseof SCAQMD v Coatins
Association of 2012 the SCD won and established that BARCT Best
Avialble Retrofit Control Techn0ology is a technolgy forcing law
and while solar is life cycle cost efficitave now it will be more
so by 2020  and must be required to be retrofit ed now for
buildioing and for processes as well as electric vehicles in the
state.

While the current peak electricity load is apx. 60 GW Gigawatts a
total of 180 GW Gigawatte peak will be needed to convwert to solar
electric vehicles and hydrogen electric either fuel cells 
electrolisis  ofwater to hydrogen  orhydrogen directly  which work
at from 50-80% efficiency and can store solar energy daily weekly
months seasonally or fpor years .

CPUC ordering plus 1 GW of Storage  is  a modest start but we
willneed apxc 180 GW Hours plus toconvert CA.

AB32 and othewr parts of CAlaw require CARB etc to convert to Solar
Renewables ASAP by 2020.  The law sssays thou shalt implement the
best technology that is possible  that is cost effective whivch
solar is. Incorpoprated herein by reference is State Health and
safety code 3800 as well as 40404.5 and 40405 and40406 ie as SCD
Solar conversion (immediate ) and implementation plan as well as
other District and the CA
    SI{P StateImplimentation Plan. Distreicts use low nox burners 
as BACT etc to can use Solar as BARCT BACT etc now. Do it already.


US DOE Department of Energy Sunshot  will have solar e;lectricity
at 5 cents per KWH by 2020  noquestion do itnow...

ITSC using CHP Combined Solar Heatand Colling (absorbtion chillers
district heatingand cooling and pv  and thermas  systems or hybrids
 are cost effective now  (also rember CA Supremes  Tech Forcing
Colar 5cents by 2020. 

PG&E went bankrupt and Comissioner Florio told me that Senator Pro
Tem John Burton put together a deal what the state would buy out
their T &
D  transssssssssssssition and distribution system for $1 but even
thought this was a go with a republican governor  and was gpo for a
few weeks  it fvell thought . But they are going BK Gin when the
share holders have topay for a minimun fof 250,00 0 year of storage
of nuclear waste as well as bankkruptcy for SCE and SDG&E and
Sempra Dirty Gas is 80-100 plus temmmmmmes the GWP global warming
potential impact compared to CIO2 must6 896dirty gas care and asall
heat etd,.etc,. more to come ...


Wolarly HE PSPC  3:11 PM 4/28/14












Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2014-04-28 14:15:55

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home